My Approach to Inspections, Negotiation, and Protecting Your Investment
One of the most common questions buyers ask me, particularly when we’re preparing an offer in a competitive market, is whether they should have a home inspection.
My answer? It depends.
I know that’s probably not the definitive answer you were hoping for, but real estate isn’t one-size-fits-all. The right approach depends on the property, the buyer’s experience, their financial situation, their tolerance for risk, and the market conditions we’re navigating.
What I don’t believe in is automatically waiving a home inspection simply because you want your offer to be competitive.
I also don’t believe in using an inspection as an opportunity to renegotiate every minor imperfection in a home.
There’s a much more thoughtful way to approach it.
I’m Erin McCormick, a Realtor with Keller Williams Vermont, and one of my favorite negotiating strategies is using an inspection contingency with a clearly defined repair-cost threshold.
It’s a way to tell the seller that we’re serious about purchasing the property, that we understand homes aren’t perfect, and that we’re not planning to nickel-and-dime them over every loose outlet or missing GFCI.
At the same time, we’re preserving an important opportunity to investigate the property’s condition and address significant, unexpected issues.
And in a state like Vermont, where homes can be old, infrastructure can be complicated, and properties often come with unique considerations, I think that’s a particularly valuable distinction.
First, What Is a Home Inspection Actually For?
A home inspection is an opportunity to learn more about the condition of a property before completing the purchase.
A qualified inspector evaluates accessible components and systems, typically including the structure, roof, electrical, plumbing, heating, insulation, ventilation, and other visible conditions within the scope of the inspection.
The resulting report may identify safety concerns, deferred maintenance, aging equipment, recommended repairs, and issues that warrant additional evaluation.
But here’s something I emphasize to buyers: a home inspection isn’t a guarantee that the property is free of problems.
Inspectors generally can’t see inside walls, predict exactly when a heating system will fail, or identify every hidden condition.
And a standard home inspection doesn’t necessarily include specialized evaluations of septic systems, private wells, radon, water quality, or other concerns that may be particularly relevant to a Vermont property.
Those may require additional inspections or testing.
I view the inspection process as a way to gather information, understand risk, and make a more informed purchasing decision.
Not as a guarantee of perfection.
Every Home Has Something Wrong With It
I’ve yet to encounter a home that couldn’t benefit from some kind of maintenance, repair, or improvement.
New construction isn’t immune. Neither is a beautifully renovated property.
And if you’re purchasing a 150-year-old Vermont farmhouse, you’re almost certainly going to encounter a few quirks.
Maybe an outlet needs a GFCI. Maybe there’s a loose handrail, a window that doesn’t open smoothly, or an aging appliance that will eventually need replacement.
These things are worth understanding, and some may involve legitimate safety concerns that should be addressed.
But they aren’t necessarily reasons to abandon a purchase or reopen negotiations.
When I work with buyers, I try to help them distinguish between routine maintenance, anticipated ownership expenses, and significant problems that materially change the financial picture of the property.
A home inspection report might contain dozens of observations.
That doesn’t mean there are dozens of reasons not to buy the home.
The important question is which findings affect your safety, intended use, financial exposure, or willingness to proceed.
My Favorite Negotiating Tool: The Inspection Repair Threshold
Here’s where I approach inspections a little differently.
When the situation and contract allow, I often discuss using an inspection contingency with a defined dollar threshold for qualifying repair costs.
The concept is straightforward.
Rather than making an offer that allows broad renegotiation over every inspection finding, we establish a financial threshold that helps distinguish ordinary repair items from more significant concerns.
For example, imagine we’re purchasing a home for $500,000.
We might discuss an inspection contingency with a $10,000 threshold for qualifying repairs, depending on the property’s condition, the buyer’s financial circumstances, and the specific contract language.
The message to the seller is that we recognize homeownership comes with maintenance and repairs, and we’re not looking to renegotiate over minor findings.
But if the inspection identifies significant issues that meet the agreed-upon threshold, we may have a contractual basis to take further action.
The key is that the actual rights depend on how the contingency is written. A threshold might apply to the total estimated cost of qualifying repairs, individual defects, or a specifically defined category of issues. It might establish a termination right, a negotiation process, or another agreed-upon remedy.
Those are meaningful differences, and I want my buyers to understand them before signing.
Why Sellers May Appreciate This Approach
Imagine you’re selling your home and reviewing two offers.
One includes a broad inspection contingency with no indication of how the buyer intends to approach findings.
The other includes a thoughtfully defined threshold that communicates the buyer isn’t planning to revisit the price over ordinary maintenance items.
Assuming the other terms are comparable, the second offer may provide greater clarity about the buyer’s expectations.
And clarity can have value.
Sellers often worry that a buyer will use the inspection process to renegotiate the purchase price after the property is under contract.
A well-structured threshold can help address that concern while preserving meaningful protection for the buyer.
Of course, not every seller will view it the same way, and no particular contingency guarantees an accepted offer.
But it’s another way to think strategically about the terms we’re offering.
Why I Don’t Believe in Nickel-and-Diming Sellers
I believe negotiations should be purposeful.
If we’ve agreed on a purchase price based on the home’s age, condition, location, and comparable sales, I don’t want to use an inspection as an opportunity to revisit every minor maintenance item we could reasonably anticipate.
A missing GFCI, a loose door handle, or a few small repairs may be worth noting and addressing after closing, depending on the circumstances.
But negotiating over every small finding can create unnecessary friction and distract from the issues that genuinely matter.
It can also affect the tone of the transaction.
I want the seller and listing agent to understand that my buyer is serious, reasonable, and prepared to move forward if the property is substantially as represented.
That doesn’t mean ignoring safety issues or accepting defects that create meaningful risk.
A relatively inexpensive repair can still be important, particularly if it involves electrical safety, water intrusion, or another hazard.
It means approaching the findings with perspective.
The goal isn’t to win every small concession. It’s to protect the buyer from significant, unexpected problems.
A Threshold Isn’t the Same as Waiving Your Inspection
This is a distinction I want buyers to understand.
Waiving an inspection contingency can mean giving up important contractual rights to investigate the property’s condition or respond to findings.
Using a threshold, when properly structured, may allow a buyer to conduct inspections while limiting the circumstances under which certain findings trigger a contractual remedy.
Those are not the same thing.
But a threshold can also limit a buyer’s rights, and it shouldn’t be treated as a risk-free compromise.
For example, what happens if an inspection identifies several problems that individually fall below the threshold but collectively represent a substantial expense?
What if the issue can’t be reliably priced before the contingency deadline?
What if the inspector recommends additional evaluation, but the specialist can’t visit the property in time?
And what happens if a serious safety concern has a repair cost below the threshold?
These are exactly the questions we need to consider when drafting the terms.
I don’t want a buyer to feel protected by a contingency that doesn’t actually provide the protection they expect.
That’s why the details matter, and why unusual or consequential contract language should be reviewed with a Vermont real estate attorney.
When I Might Recommend a More Traditional Inspection Contingency
There are plenty of situations where a repair threshold may not be the best approach.
If a buyer has limited financial reserves, even a few thousand dollars in unexpected repairs could be significant.
If a property has visible signs of deferred maintenance, structural concerns, water intrusion, or aging mechanical systems, we may need more flexibility to investigate and respond to findings.
A first-time buyer with little experience maintaining a home may have a very different comfort level from someone who’s renovated several properties.
And if the market isn’t especially competitive, there may be little reason to narrow inspection protections simply to make an offer more attractive.
The right strategy should reflect the buyer’s circumstances.
I don’t believe in using the same contingency language for every property or every client.
What About Waiving an Inspection Entirely?
There are situations where a buyer may consider purchasing a property without an inspection contingency.
An experienced investor purchasing a property intended for a substantial renovation may be comfortable accepting more uncertainty.
A buyer might also have access to relevant professional expertise or have completed certain permitted evaluations before making an offer.
And in a highly competitive situation, a buyer may decide that limiting contingencies is a risk they’re willing and financially able to take.
But I want that decision to be deliberate.
I want buyers to understand that even a newer or recently renovated home can have hidden defects, and that waiving an inspection contingency can substantially limit their options if problems emerge.
A buyer shouldn’t feel pressured into giving up important protections simply because everyone else appears to be doing it.
My job is to explain the tradeoffs, not make the decision for them.
Vermont Homes Deserve a Closer Look
Vermont properties come with considerations that don’t always fit neatly into a standard home inspection.
Our housing stock includes historic farmhouses, older village homes, mountain properties, and rural houses with infrastructure that may differ considerably from what buyers are accustomed to elsewhere.
And many of those features deserve additional attention.
Wells and Water Quality
If a property has a private well or spring, I want to understand the water source and discuss appropriate testing.
Water quality isn’t something you can reliably determine by looking at the faucet or tasting the water.
Depending on the property, testing may include bacteria and other contaminants of concern.
Septic Systems
A standard home inspection generally isn’t a substitute for a specialized septic inspection.
We’ll want to understand what system serves the property, whether records and permits are available, and whether its documented capacity aligns with the property’s use.
Private Roads and Shared Driveways
A home inspector isn’t necessarily evaluating the legal rights and maintenance obligations associated with a private road.
Those questions may require reviewing deeds, easements, road maintenance agreements, and lender requirements with the appropriate professionals.
Heating Systems
Vermont homes may rely on oil, propane, wood, pellets, electric heat pumps, or several systems working together.
I want buyers to understand what equipment serves the home, its apparent condition, and whether additional evaluation is warranted.
Older Homes and Historic Construction
An older home may have beautiful original details alongside aging infrastructure.
That doesn’t automatically make it a poor investment, but it does mean the inspection strategy should reflect the property’s age, systems, and construction.
The important thing is understanding what you’re buying.
The Inspection Is Also a Financial Planning Tool
Even when an inspection doesn’t reveal anything that warrants renegotiating or terminating the contract, it can still provide tremendous value.
It gives buyers a starting point for understanding the maintenance and improvements they may need to plan for.
Perhaps the roof has several years of useful life remaining, but replacement should be part of a longer-term budget.
Maybe the heating system is functioning adequately but approaching an age when replacement becomes more likely.
Or perhaps there are relatively minor safety improvements worth prioritizing after closing.
That’s valuable information.
I encourage buyers to think about homeownership beyond the purchase price and monthly mortgage payment.
The cost of maintaining a home is part of the investment, and an inspection can help make those future responsibilities more tangible.
I Want My Buyers to Be Competitive, Not Careless
One of the most important parts of my job is helping buyers balance two competing priorities.
They want to put forward an offer that a seller will accept.
But they also want to protect themselves from purchasing a property with unexpected problems they can’t afford or aren’t prepared to address.
Those goals don’t have to be mutually exclusive.
A thoughtfully structured inspection contingency can sometimes create a middle ground.
It can communicate that the buyer isn’t expecting a perfect home, isn’t looking to renegotiate routine maintenance, and is willing to accept a reasonable level of risk.
At the same time, it can preserve clearly defined rights if significant issues arise.
But the threshold needs to be appropriate for the buyer, the property, and the actual terms of the agreement.
A number that works for one buyer may be completely inappropriate for another.
And sometimes the best negotiating strategy is to preserve a more traditional inspection contingency, even if that makes an offer less competitive.
I would rather have an informed buyer make a decision they can live with than win a bidding situation by taking on risks they don’t fully understand.
My Approach: Know the Property, Understand the Risk, and Negotiate With Purpose
I don’t view a home inspection as a pass-or-fail test.
I view it as one of the tools we use to understand a property and make a thoughtful purchasing decision.
When we’re preparing an offer, I want to consider the home’s age and condition, what we already know, what still needs to be investigated, the seller’s priorities, and my buyer’s financial comfort level.
Then we can discuss the inspection strategy that makes sense.
Sometimes that means a traditional contingency.
Sometimes it means a carefully defined repair-cost threshold.
And occasionally, a buyer may decide to pursue a different approach after understanding the risks.
What matters is that we’re making the decision intentionally.
Because my goal isn’t simply to help buyers get a Vermont home under contract.
It’s to help them purchase a property with confidence, understand the investment they’re making, and avoid unnecessary financial surprises.
We’re not going to nickel-and-dime over every GFCI or loose door handle. But we’re also not going to ignore a significant problem just to get to the closing table.
That’s the balance I believe good buyer representation should strike.
If you’re thinking about buying a home in Vermont, I’d love to help you develop an offer strategy that considers the market, the property, and the protections that matter most to you.
Let's Talk About Buying a Home in Vermont
Erin McCormick | Realtor, Keller Williams Vermont
Founder, Travel Like a Local® Vermont | Live Local Vermont
Inspection contingencies and repair thresholds depend on the specific contract language. This article provides general information, not legal or inspection advice. Consult a Vermont-licensed attorney and qualified inspectors regarding your transaction.